Despite the sad contempt for all that science is demonstrated by most Italians, it must be said that at least we have the problem of creationism (now also called "Intelligent Design ") is relatively low compared to the American situation, which sees more than half the population unable to accept the fact already demonstrated arcidimostrato and more than 150 years, upon which the entirety of the biological sciences and then a large part of medicine and that every passing moment is proven and understood more and more. However, even among those throughout the world accept evolution, the majority is convinced that it does not interfere with the idea of \u200b\u200bthe existence of God - Many evolutionists are religious, and even among many of the atheists reigns conviction of the need of absolute respect for others' beliefs, for the sake of a quiet life, which can certainly appear correct. Nevertheless:
Respect beliefs of others is not something due to anyone. If so, we would be forced to also respect the beliefs of racists, Nazis, pedophiles and the rest. The convictions of others in the field of conduct must be respected if they have reasons to be logical and fair as they are, otherwise the person should be prevented to avoid danger and especially to those around him. It 's the principle behind the little things like, "Whisk in jail those who believe that personal wealth can be obtained by fraud and contempt of the law, and acts accordingly." Now, you say, how religion can be compared to something like a crime? It said many of the principles justice and common sense. The point is that the only reason to believe in something is to act based on this belief, and then those who believe in God should base its actions on the word of God, and here's the catch. Our world is based on scientific laws, the laws do not approximate (at best) or completely insane to be a dummy, whose existence would be proved only by a book (at this point I could say that, there being as many as six films Star Wars, the existence of Lord Vader is more proven than that of God). Those who try to interact with this world is not following its own rules but those of God is doomed to fail in its intent (if lucky), or putting himself in danger and those around him (if it is bad luck). Frankly, I do not know what to think of those who say they believe in God and then live as if they believed it: what is expressed, exactly, they believe? This is not faith, it's neurosis. Returning
evolution: many say that it is possible to think that God has given way to life and then it has evolved as we all know (I will not even consider what they say those abortions gutless supporters of intelligent Design, why has not the dignity of a burst of diarrhea wild boar). E 'possible? Yes it is, in a surreal vision of the facts and unnecessarily forced, among other things in which God is presented as a complete jerk. Let me explain: if you want to accept both the scientific facts and the existence of God, you painted a scenario in which God, after the beginning of time, employs as many as 10 billion years to create life (estimated age of ' Universe: Some 14 billion years - estimated age of life: more than 3 billion years). Homo sapiens sapiens appeared about 200,000 years ago, and just this year, Craig Venter has created artificial life. It 's my impression, or 200,000 years, a figure considerably less than 10 billion years? This would mean that we humans are exactly 5000 times faster and more intelligent than a perfect one. Wow - Down with the modesty! But not over here. Now according to those who want to reconcile science and faith, evolution has taken place (I repeat once again, I do not take into account that shit ID), that is, in practice, God not only takes a disproportionate time to create the life, but also having done sitting on a deck chair and washes his hands, letting the random mutation and natural selection do the rest, which among other things mean that we are his beloved children made in his image and likeness, unless the good Lord has not told that, with a tremendous shot in the ass, the case would have produced millions of years of trial and error the very creatures he had in mind. So much for being perfect, good and omnipotent. God is by definition all three things, and as the god who jumps out of reconciling science and faith do not have these attributes, certainly not a god and there is no reason to postulate its existence.
0 comments:
Post a Comment